Home
Search
עברית
Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Anti-Israel Conferences
Lawfare
Anti-Israel Academic Resolutions
Lectures Interrupted
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
On the Brighter Side
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Donate
Tel Aviv University
Aeyal Gross, the New Shlomo Sand of Tel Aviv University?
17.03.14
Editorial Note
 
IAM has occasionally reported on the radical academics who use their positions to push for politically-motivated polemics masquerading as scholarship.  Shlomo Sand, a professor of French history and culture and the author of the Invention of the Jewish People and the Invention of the Land of Israel, is probably the best known in this category.  
 
Aeyal Gross, an associate professor in TAU's Law School, is arguably a close runner-up.  On his home-page Gross describes one of his research interest as critical approaches to law.   Part of the family of critical, neo-Marxist approaches in the social sciences, critical law has been described in the following way:
 
"A family of new legal theories, launched since 1970, share commitments to criticize not merely particular legal rules or outcomes, but larger structures of conventional legal thought and practice. According to critical legal scholars, dominant legal doctrines and conceptions perpetuate patterns of injustice and dominance by whites, men, the wealthy, employers, and heterosexuals. The "Crits" argue that prevailing modes of legal reasoning pretend to afford neutral and objective treatment of claims while shielding structures of power from fundamental reconsideration. Critical theorists also maintain that despite the law's claims to accord justified, determinate and controlled expressions of power, law fails on each of these dimensions and instead law mystifies outsiders in an effort to legitimate the results in courts and legislatures."

Judging by his list of publications, it seems that critical law is his main interest, including such topics as humanitarian law in the occupied territories and queer theory.  But it is Gross's contention that Israel uses its liberal treatment of gays as a propaganda tool that he dubbed "pinkwashing" that attracted global attention. 
  
At his recent lecture at the Sociology Department of the Free University of Brussels, he repeats the accusations without providing a shred of empirical evidence.  Gross can get away with discounting facts, because of the claim that critical law theorists have a privileged view of reality because they (and they alone) can uncover the "dominant legal doctrines and conceptions perpetuate patterns of injustice and dominance by whites, men, the wealthy, employers, and heterosexuals."
 
It is noted, that the mainstream gay and lesbian movement in Israel has rejected Gross's interpretation.  This, of course, did not phase Gross, who has accused mainstream gays lesbians of the Marxist "false conciseness," namely that they have been co-opted and brainwashed by the authorities into "homonationalism." 
 
Pinkwashing, the intellectual construct developed by Gross, has been extensively used by gays and lesbians in BDS activities around the world as reported recently by IAM. 
 
Arguably, Gross has now joined Shlomo Sand, who made a "career" out of peddling baseless theories that delegitimize Israel.  More to the point, like Sand, Gross has misused his academic position while being supported by taxpayers.


http://www.ulb.ac.be/is/ags/RESUMES/Gross-02-14.html

Atelier Genre(s) et Sexualité(s) de l'institut de Sociologie de 

L'Université Libre de Bruxelles



(Tel Aviv University)

The Politics of LGBT Rights in Israël: Between (Homo) Normativity and (Homo) Nationalism and Queer Politics
Monday 10 February, 18h
Room Henri Janne, Institut de Sociologie (15th floor), Building S
Avenue Jeanne, 44, 1050 Bruxelles
 
Abstract 
This paper examines the politics of LGBT rights in Israel, employing critical analysis of the terms "homonormativity" and "homonationalism": homonormativity has been described as a neoliberal sexual politics, which does not contest the dominant heteronormative institutions and is anchored in domesticity and consumption; homonationalism has been described as national homonormativity, in the framework of which domesticated homosexuals provide ammunition to nationalism. 
The discussion of homonationalism points to a process in which the homosexual changes from someone perceived as a threat to the state and its security, to someone who is considered embedded within the state and who distinguishes it, by virtue of the tolerance shown toward him, from other countries. Homonormativity and homonationalism are preconditions for "pinkwashing" — the use of LGBT rights for propaganda purposes. The paper points to the need for non-reductive conceptions of the connections between homonationalism, homonormativity and pinkwashing, as also to the contradictions within the idea of homonormativity itself between domesticity and consumption. 
The murderous attack on the gay youth group in Tel Aviv was a turning point in the politics of LGBT rights. The responses to it marked the rise of the new homonationalism, but also the strengthening of critiques of it in a way that created divisions among activists. The Article points to the "deal" that was contrived in the shadow of the attack between the gay establishment and the national establishment, and to the crisis of queer politics. In response to the rise of homonormativity and homonationalism, there has been a strengthening of the politics of identity of groups excluded from it, and queer politics as a politics that challenges essentialist notions of identity is in crisis. Sometimes, the queer idea turns into just another identity ("q") in the alphabet soup, at the expense of its critical potential and effectiveness. 
I also address the judgment of the Israeli Supreme Court in the Jerusalem Open House case which is a turning point, both in the context of the recognition of equality for the gay community, and for the way in which the Supreme Court adopted the discourse concerning LGBT rights as the markers of Israel as a liberal democracy, distinguishing it from other countries.
Bio-bibliography
Aeyal Gross teaches International Law and Constitutional Law at Tel Aviv University. He also teaches as Visiting Reader at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in the University of London. He served as a research fellow at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies at the University of London, as a Visiting Fellow at the Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Studies in South Africa, and as a Joseph Flom Global Health and Human Rights Fellow at Harvard Law School. Additionally, he taught in Columbia University, in the University of Toronto, and in the European University Institute.
Aeyal Gross serves as a member of the Board of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, is a founding member of TAU’s LGBT & Queer Studies Forum, and contributes regularly to the Israeli daily Ha’aretz. He is the author of numerous articles on human rights and queer politics in Israël, and the co-editor, with Colleen Flood, of The Right To Health At The Public/Private Divide: A Global Comparative Study (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming 2014).
 

Pour plus de renseignements, contacter:
Cathy Herbrand (FNRS/ULB)
David Paternotte (FNRS/
 

Back to "Tel Aviv University"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 243686245Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version
    blueweb