Home
Search
עברית
Board & Mission Statement
Why IAM?
About Us
Articles by IAM Associates
Ben-Gurion University
Hebrew University
University of Haifa
Tel Aviv University
Other Institutions
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Israelis in Non-Israeli Universities
Anti-Israel Petitions Supported by Israeli Academics
General Articles
Anti-Israel Conferences
Lawfare
Anti-Israel Academic Resolutions
Lectures Interrupted
Activists Profiles
Readers Forum
On the Brighter Side
Photographs
How can I complain?
Contact Us / Subscribe
Donate
Boycott Calls Against Israel
Legal Scholars Call to Boycott a Law Research Forum at the Hebrew University

29.11.17
Editorial Note

Palestinian and pro-Palestinian activists have been quite busy with new BDS efforts.  In the latest endeavor posted on a Critical Legal Thinking website, legal scholars and international lawyers called on the European Society of International Law (ESIL) not to hold the 2018 research forum at the Hebrew University. Scheduled to take place between 28 of February and 1 March 2018, the research forum is titled "International Law in Times of Disorder and Contestation."

The purpose of the 2018 research forum in Jerusalem is to address "challenges to the international legal order emanating from dynamics of disengagement from multilateral governance, a perceived erosion of support by states and other stakeholders in existing international institutions, contestation of universal values, shifts in hegemonic power at the global and regional level, and the rise in populist, antiliberal, anti-institutional and isolationist political sentiments in various regions of the world. Such processes occur in tandem with growing concerns about the suitability of the existing international legal structures and approaches to address global phenomena such as migration, cyber-security threats and climate change, and to influence the conduct of non-state actors such as corporations. It is the combination of the ‘re-emergence of the state’ from out of the shadows of multilateralism and international governance, a growing discontent and backlash from multiple sectors of society directed against existing international norms and institutions and the limited ability of the latter to address serious contemporary problems, which generate a sense of crisis and a possible plunge towards world disorder (Although, it may also be claimed that the current state of affairs creates new opportunities for introducing much needed reforms in international law)."

In an internal email from the organizing committee to members of ESIL they promised "to make a good faith effort to involve Palestinian scholars in the event; to facilitate visa formalities for conference participants and arrange video conference facilities for speakers who are unable to travel to Israel; to ensure that no part of the RF takes place in the occupied territories; to include Palestinian-owned hotels in East Jerusalem in the list of recommended places to stay; to not invite government officials to speak at the event; to carefully monitor security and inform the Board of any developments." 

Yet, such intentions were not good enough for the Palestinian and pro-Palestinian group of "Concerned International Lawyers" which endorsed the "widespread boycott of Israeli academic institutions by Palestinian scholars (who also call on other academics to boycott)."  The group issued a statement which reads: "We believe that holding the annual forum on international law in an occupied territory legitimates this occupation and all of the other human rights violations that are part of it.  While we are aware that the original buildings of the Hebrew University are located in the area that was designated in 1948 as the “Demilitarised Zone”, whose status is contested, the University has expanded significantly since the 1967 occupation, and significant parts of it fall beyond the “Demilitarised Zone” line and are in the Palestinian occupied territory.  We believe that it is unbecoming for an organisation that is committed to the rule of law and international law to hold its annual forum in an institution whose campus is at least in part on an occupied territory. It is more so when this occupation is in its 50th year. Therefore, we shall not participate in this event, and we urge ESIL to reconsider its decision."  

But from their explanatory note they omitted the fact that the Hebrew University's official inauguration was in 1925, long before the 1948 and 1967 wars. 

The contemporary Middle East has been buffeted by unprecedented violence, Islamist terrorism, the collapse of the state, and widespread lawlessness.  Concerned scholars have not yet organized enough conferences to address these issues which had turned the lives of millions of people in the region into hell. Given the collapse of civilizational norms in large swaths of the region, obsessive focus on Israel by Palestinian and pro-Palestinian groups is all the more glaring. It is also a testimony to intellectual and moral bankruptcy.  



ESIL Research Forum - Jerusalem 2018

International Law in Times of Disorder and Contestation


2018 European Society of International Law Research Forum 

28 February - 1 March 2018
Hebrew University Faculty of Law, Jerusalem, Israel
Call for Papers: International Law in Times of Disorder and Contestation

The ESIL Research Forum is a scholarly conference that promotes engagement with research in progress by members of the Society. It has a small and intensive format. The Forum targets in particular scholars at an early stage of their careers, especially advanced PhD students and post-doctoral researchers. Approximately 15 - 20 papers will be selected from among the submissions and, during the Forum, paper presenters will receive comments on their papers from members of the ESIL Board and invited experts.The 2018 Research Forum addresses challenges to the international legal order emanating from dynamics of disengagement from multilateral governance, a perceived erosion of support by states and other stakeholders in existing international institutions, contestation of universal values, shifts in hegemonic power at the global and regional level, and the rise in populist, antiliberal, anti-institutional and isolationist political sentiments in various regions of the world. Such processes occur in tandem with growing concerns about the suitability of the existing international legal structures and approaches to address global phenomena such as migration, cyber-security threats and climate change, and to influence the conduct of non-state actors such as corporations. It is the combination of the ‘re-emergence of the state’ from out of the shadows of multilateralism and international governance, a growing discontent and backlash from multiple sectors of society directed against existing international norms and institutions and the limited ability of the latter to address serious contemporary problems, which generate a sense of crisis and a possible plunge towards world disorder (Although, it may also be claimed that the current state of affairs creates new opportunities for introducing much needed reforms in international law).The deadline for submission of abstracts has passed. The organizing committee is currently considering the applications it received. The decisions of the organizing committee will be published as soon as possible.

Organizing Committee:

Prof. Christina Binder, Prof.Tomer Broude, Prof. Pierre d’Argent, Prof. Guy Harpaz, Prof. Moshe Hirsch, Prof. Yuval Shany, Prof. Yael Ronen.


 

===============================================================


— Law and the Political —


Statement by Legal Scholars and International Lawyers Against Holding ESIL Forum at the Hebrew University in East Jerusalem

by Concerned International Lawyers • 23 November 2017

To add your name, please email: palpetition17@gmail.com. The statement is open to all law academics and international lawyers. You do not have to be a member of ESIL or based in Europe to sign.
The European Society of International Law (ESIL) is holding its Research Forum at the Hebrew University in February/March. Ten Palestinian human rights organisations have condemned this decision calling on ESIL to reconsider its decision and urging international lawyers and academics to not participate in this event.
As legal scholars and international lawyers committed to the rule of law and human rights, we are dismayed by the decision of the European Society of International Law (ESIL) to hold its 2018 annual research forum at the Mount Scopus Campus of the Hebrew University. We believe that holding the annual forum on international law in an occupied territory legitimates this occupation and all of the other human rights violations that are part of it.
While we are aware that the original buildings of the Hebrew University are located in the area that was designated in 1948 as the “Demilitarised Zone”, whose status is contested, the University has expanded significantly since the 1967 occupation, and significant parts of it fall beyond the “Demilitarised Zone” line and are in the Palestinian occupied territory.
We believe that it is unbecoming for an organisation that is committed to the rule of law and international law to hold its annual forum in an institution whose campus is at least in part on an occupied territory. It is more so when this occupation is in its 50th year. Therefore, we shall not participate in this event, and we urge ESIL to reconsider its decision.
Institutions are for affiliation purposes only.
Professor (Emeritus) Georges Abi-Saab, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Professor (Emeritus) John Dugard, University of Leiden and the University of the Witwatersrand, former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
Professor (Emeritus) Richard Falk, Princeton University, and former UN Special Rapporteur on human rights situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory
Dr. Noha Abueldahab, Visiting Fellow, Brookings Institution
Dr. Grietje Baars, City, University of London
Dr. Nesrine Badawi, American University in Cairo
Dr. Samia Bano, SOAS, University of London
Dr. Arnulf Becker Lorca, Brown University
Dr. Jason Beckett, The American University in Cairo
Faisal Bhabha, Associate Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
Dr. Brenna Bhandar, SOAS University of London
Dr. Amar Bhatia, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University
Professor (Emeritus) George Bisharat, UC Hastings College of the Law
Dr. Isra Black, University of York
Professor Bill Bowring, Birkbeck, University of London
Dr Yassin M’Boge Brunger, Queen’s University Belfast
Reem Al-Botmeh, Birzeit University
Professor Marcel Brus, University of Groningen
Dr. Michelle Burgis-Kasthala, University of Edinburgh/Australian National University
Professor Irina Ceric, Kwantlen Polytechnic University
Professor Cyra Akila Choudhury, Florida International University
Dr. Tanzil Chowdhury, University of Birmingham
Professor Olivier Corten, Directeur du Centre de droit international, Université libre de Bruxelles
Dr. Marios Costa, City, University of London
Professor (Emeritus) Eric David, Président du Centre de droit international, Université libre de Bruxelles
Dr. Julia Dehm, La Trobe University
Dr. Sara Dehm, University of Technology Sydney
Professor François Dubuisson, Université libre de Bruxelles
Dr. Nadine El-Enany, Birkbeck University of London
Dr. Luis Eslava, University of Kent
Dr. Michael Fakhri, University of Oregon
Dr. Tomaso Ferrando, University of Bristol
Professor Martin Gallié, Université du Québec à Montréal
Professor Conor Gearty, London School of Economics
Professor Gustavo Gozzi, University of Bologna
Dr. Markus Gunneflo, Lund University
Professor Penny Green, Queen Mary University of London
Friederycke Haijer, Utrecht University
Dr Vanja Hamzić, SOAS University of London
Dr. Jeff Handmaker, International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam
Dr. Kevin Hearty, Queen’s University Belfast
Dr. Gina Heathcote, SOAS University of London
Dr. Loveday Hodson, University of Leicester
Dr. Nora Honkala, City, University of London
Emily Jones, Lecturer in Law, University of Essex
Dr. Henry Jones, University of Durham
Dr. Ioannis Kalpouzos, City, University of London
Dr. Michael Kearney University of Sussex
Dr. Asem Khalil, Vice-President for Community Affairs, H.H. Shaikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani Chair in Constitutional and International Law, Birzeit University
Professor Laleh Khalili, SOAS University of London
Dr. Adil Hassan Khan, Melbourne Law School
Dr. Zeynep Kivilcim, Berlin Institute for Advanced Study
Kojo Koram, Lecturer in Law, University of Essex
Tor Krever, University of Warwick
Dr. Vidya Kumar, University of Leicester
Dr. Troy Lavers, University of Leicester
Anne Lagerwall, Université libre de Bruxelles
Dr. Thomas MacManus, Queen Mary University of London
Professor (Emeritus) Wade Mansell, University of Kent
Dr. Anne-Charlotte Martineau, Ecole Normale Supérieure
Alexandra Masako Goossens, Graduate Institute, Geneva
Dr. Mazen Masri, City, University of London
Dr. Akanksha Mehta, University of Sussex
Ladan Mehranvar, lawyer, SJD candidate in International Law, University of Toronto
Professor Chantal Meloni, University of Milan
Parvathi Menon, Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Procedure, Luxembourg
Dr. Nima Mersadi Tabari, City, University of London
Dr. Mathias Möschel, Central European University, Budapest
Dr. Usha Natarajan, The American University in Cairo
Professor Vasuki Nesiah, New York University
Professor Donald Nicolson OBE, University of Essex
Dr. Gearóid Ó Cuinn, Lancaster University
Dr. Paul O’Connell, SOAS, University of London
Professor Dianne Otto, Melbourne Law School
Dr Alice Panepinto, Queen’s University Belfast
Dr. Rose Sydney Parfitt, University of Kent/University of Melbourne
Dr. Amin Parsa, Independent Scholar, Prev., Lund University
Professor (Emeritus) Sol Picciotto, Lancaster University
Dr. Adamantia (Mando) Rachovitsa, University of Groningen
Dr. Rahul Rao, SOAS University of London
Professor Danya Reda, Peking University School of Transnational Law
Dr. John Reynolds, National University of Ireland Maynooth
Dr. Hani Sayed, American University in Cairo
Dr. Bérénice K. Schramm, Université du Québec à Montréal
Professor Iain Scobbie, University of Manchester
Moheb Shafaqyar, Refugee Law Clinic Berlin, Humboldt-University Berlin
Dr. Halla Shoaibi, Birzeit University
Dr. Adrian Smith, Carleton University
Dr. Graham Smith, University of Manchester
Dr. Nimer Sultany, SOAS University of London
Dr. Mai Taha, The American University in Cairo
Dr. Anastasia Tataryn, University of Liverpool
Sâ Benjamin Traoré, University of Neuchâtel
Dr. Ntina Tzouvala, Melbourne Law School
Dr. Umut Özsu, Carleton University
Professor Lynn Welchman, SOAS University of London
Professor David Whyte, University of Liverpool
Professor Daniel Wilsher, City, University of London
Dr. Sujith Xavier, University of Windsor
Dr. Federico Zanettin, Università di Perugia
Paola Zichi, SOAS, University of London

Explanatory Note

Location of the Hebrew University

During the 1948 war, it was agreed between the Israeli and Jordanian military commanders that the Mount Scopus area, which included the Hebrew University (HUJI) buildings, would be a demilitarised zone. After Israel occupied the West Bank (including Jerusalem) in 1967, the Israeli Government confiscated the land around the Hebrew University and Hadassah hospital, and HUJI embarked on large-scale expansion plans. The expansion extended beyond the “Demilitarised Zone” and included private Palestinian land. As it stands today, significant areas of the Hebrew University are in occupied Palestinian area, and are effectively settlements. The areas are marked with the black line in the map below (the red line is the Demilitarised Zone), and they include: part of the Maiersdorf Dormitories, all of the Alan Bronfman Dormitories, the Students Village, the Lerner Family Indoor Sports Complex and the Gilbert Tennis Courts.

Role in the Settlement Project

HUJI is at least in part in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). These parts are settlements for they are used to house the population of an occupying power in an occupied territory. Furthermore, HUJI’s Mount Scopus campus as a whole is part of Israel’s illegal extension of its powers and control over the OPT. As a large higher education institution with thousands of students and employees, its presence in this area stimulates settler activities in East Jerusalem, especially in the adjacent neighbourhoods of the French Hill, Ramat Eshkol and Sheikh Jarrah and beyond. HUJI benefits from the settlement infra-structure, the transport lines, and the access roads, which are all in the occupied territory, some of which are on privately-owned Palestinian land. This infra-structure is also designed in a way to favour Israeli settlements in the area, and to the detriment of the local Palestinian population. HUJI’s campus is an integral part of Israel’s settlement enterprise in East Jerusalem.
HUJI itself does not see Israel’s occupation as an occupation, and does not distinguish between the “Demilitarised Zone” and other occupied areas. In fact, HUJI views the occupation favourably and calls it “liberation”, insinuating that Palestinian or Arab control should be seen as an occupation. As its official website states, “On the 7th of June, the Old City of Jerusalem was liberated, and the city was reunited. Efforts to return the university to Mt. Scopus began immediately, but the full restoration and building of the old/new campus took many years.” [Emphasis added]. HUJI also awarded the then Chief of Military Staff, Yitzhak Rabin, an honorary doctorate for his role in the occupation, or as HUJI’s website puts it his role “in reuniting Jerusalem, and for enabling the return of the university to Mt. Scopus.”
In 2012, the Israeli Government announced plans to build a new military college nearby (which will be wholly or in part in the OPT) because of its proximity to the University. The University did not oppose these plans, on the contrary, it expressed its support for them.

Assurances given by the Organisers to ESIL’s Board

The local organisers of the event gave a number of assurances to ESIL regarding the event.
The assurances offered by the organisers (based on emails sent by ESIL) are:
— to make a good faith effort to involve Palestinian scholars in the event.
— to facilitate visa formalities for conference participants and arrange video conference facilities for speakers who are unable to travel to Israel.
— to ensure that no part of the RF takes place in the occupied territories.
— to include Palestinian-owned hotels in East Jerusalem in the list of recommended places to stay.
— to not invite government officials to speak at the event.
— to carefully monitor security and inform the Board of any developments.
While some of these are common sense assurances, they do not address the main issue, which is that a significant part of the HUJI is on occupied territory; that, in effect, HUJI is part of the settlements project; and that holding the event at HUJI is effectively an endorsement of the occupation and the associated human rights violations. None of the assurances provided can remedy these problems.
More specifically, some of the assurances are either impractical or plainly offensive to Palestinians.
Assurance number 2 ignores the widespread boycott of Israeli academic institutions by Palestinian scholars (who also call on other academics to boycott) in protest against the role of Israeli academia in maintaining the occupation. Even if a few Palestinian scholars wanted to participate, they will most likely be unable to attend because of Israel’s restrictions on their movement.
Assurance number 3 “to ensure that no part of the RF takes place in the occupied territories” is impossible to comply with because HUJI itself sits at least in part on occupied land.
Assurance number 4 about including Palestinian-owned hotels in East Jerusalem in the list of recommended hotels is disrespectful to the local Palestinian population. It implies that the damage done by ESIL’s endorsement of the occupation and settlements could be remedied if the conference goers are given the option to spend a few hundred dollars in Palestinian-owned businesses.

HUJI’s Complicity in the Occupation

HUJI is complicit in Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in a number of ways:
1. In addition to being an integral part of the settlement enterprise in East Jerusalem, it actively played an important role to the illegal taking of Palestinian property in East Jerusalem, including attempts to evict nine Palestinian families from their homes.
2. HUJI maintains very intimate links with the Israeli army and Israeli security arms. These links include academic cooperation. One example is the Talpiot Programme academic and military training designed and delivered by HUJI and the army (for the programme’s website in Hebrew, see http://www.talpiot.mod.gov.il/traing/Pages/default.aspx). Other academic programmes included specially tailored programmes for the personnel of the Israeli secret service (General Security Service, also known as the Shabak) which is responsible for torturing Palestinian political prisoners. HUJI promotes the General Security Service as a potential employer for its students and graduates.
3. HUJI has taken measures to support Israeli soldiers who are in active combat. During the 2014 in Gaza, HUJI supported the war effort by fundraising for and offering financial support for its soldier students who participated in combat. HUJI and its official students union had a campaign to collect goods to be delivered to the soldiers fighting in Gaza.
4. As opposed to some universities in South Africa which took a formal institutional position against apartheid and consistently condemned it, HUJI has never made any public statement against the occupation and its associated human rights violations. In fact, HUJI shows support for the occupation and refers to it as “liberation”.



CLT is a plat­form for crit­ical legal schol­ars and allies to pub­lish the­or­et­ic­ally informed com­ment and ana­lysis. We invite submissions that resonate with our founding purpose.You are free to share/repost/republish for non-commercial purposes. Please link to source. Images and other media may be under different licences.


Back to "Boycott Calls Against Israel"Send Response
Top Page
    Developed by Sitebank & Powered by Blueweb Internet Services
    Visitors: 192930625Send to FriendAdd To FavoritesMake It HomepagePrint version
    blueweb